Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available August 20, 2026
-
Plasmonics and optical metastructures represent cutting-edge frontiers in nanophotonics, enabling on-demand control of light at the subwavelength scale. This special topic of the Journal of Applied Physics highlights the recent advancements and synergy of the two fields, delving into the fundamental physics governing plasmonic phenomena and showcasing innovative metastructures that hold significant potential for diverse applications, including sensing, optical manipulation, wireless communication, optical computing, and beyond.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available March 14, 2026
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 14, 2025
-
Abstract Photonic device development (PDD) has achieved remarkable success in designing and implementing new devices for controlling light across various wavelengths, scales, and applications, including telecommunications, imaging, sensing, and quantum information processing. PDD is an iterative, five-step process that consists of: (i) deriving device behavior from design parameters, (ii) simulating device performance, (iii) finding the optimal candidate designs from simulations, (iv) fabricating the optimal device, and (v) measuring device performance. Classically, all these steps involve Bayesian optimization, material science, control theory, and direct physics-driven numerical methods. However, many of these techniques are computationally intractable, monetarily costly, or difficult to implement at scale. In addition, PDD suffers from large optimization landscapes, uncertainties in structural or optical characterization, and difficulties in implementing robust fabrication processes. However, the advent of machine learning over the past decade has provided novel, data-driven strategies for tackling these challenges, including surrogate estimators for speeding up computations, generative modeling for noisy measurement modeling and data augmentation, reinforcement learning for fabrication, and active learning for experimental physical discovery. In this review, we present a comprehensive perspective on these methods to enable machine-learning-assisted PDD (ML-PDD) for efficient design optimization with powerful generative models, fast simulation and characterization modeling under noisy measurements, and reinforcement learning for fabrication. This review will provide researchers from diverse backgrounds with valuable insights into this emerging topic, fostering interdisciplinary efforts to accelerate the development of complex photonic devices and systems.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available July 3, 2026
-
Abstract Current research practice for optimizing bioink involves exhaustive experimentation with multi-material composition for determining the printability, shape fidelity and biocompatibility. Predicting bioink properties can be beneficial to the research community but is a challenging task due to the non-Newtonian behavior in complex composition. Existing models such as Cross model become inadequate for predicting the viscosity for heterogeneous composition of bioinks. In this paper, we utilize a machine learning framework to accurately predict the viscosity of heterogeneous bioink compositions, aiming to enhance extrusion-based bioprinting techniques. Utilizing Bayesian optimization (BO), our strategy leverages a limited dataset to inform our model. This is a technique especially useful of the typically sparse data in this domain. Moreover, we have also developed a mask technique that can handle complex constraints, informed by domain expertise, to define the feasible parameter space for the components of the bioink and their interactions. Our proposed method is focused on predicting the intrinsic factor (e.g. viscosity) of the bioink precursor which is tied to the extrinsic property (e.g. cell viability) through the mask function. Through the optimization of the hyperparameter, we strike a balance between exploration of new possibilities and exploitation of known data, a balance crucial for refining our acquisition function. This function then guides the selection of subsequent sampling points within the defined viable space and the process continues until convergence is achieved, indicating that the model has sufficiently explored the parameter space and identified the optimal or near-optimal solutions. Employing this AI-guided BO framework, we have developed, tested, and validated a surrogate model for determining the viscosity of heterogeneous bioink compositions. This data-driven approach significantly reduces the experimental workload required to identify bioink compositions conducive to functional tissue growth. It not only streamlines the process of finding the optimal bioink compositions from a vast array of heterogeneous options but also offers a promising avenue for accelerating advancements in tissue engineering by minimizing the need for extensive experimental trials.more » « less
-
Machine learning with artificial neural networks has recently transformed many scientific fields by introducing new data analysis and information processing techniques. Despite these advancements, efficient implementation of machine learning on conventional computers remains challenging due to speed and power constraints. Optical computing schemes have quickly emerged as the leading candidate for replacing their electronic counterparts as the backbone for artificial neural networks. Some early integrated photonic neural network (IPNN) techniques have already been fast-tracked to industrial technologies. This review article focuses on the next generation of optical neural networks (ONNs), which can perform machine learning algorithms directly in free space. We have aptly named this class of neural network model the free space optical neural network (FSONN). We systematically compare FSONNs, IPNNs, and the traditional machine learning models with regard to their fundamental principles, forward propagation model, and training process. We survey several broad classes of FSONNs and categorize them based on the technology used in their hidden layers. These technologies include 3D printed layers, dielectric and plasmonic metasurface layers, and spatial light modulators. Finally, we summarize the current state of FSONN research and provide a roadmap for its future development.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
